Saffex Status: Hall Of Fame Posts: 11738
RE: The Dunces attacked Dave - when he said March 19, 2015, 13:33:22Yeah I recall your comparison and Peterson turned out to have slightly better stats than JP but we conceded that this would be the case given the number of overs Peterson had bowled versus the part time stuff JP has mostly bowled.
As for 5 po, that is pretty reasonable for your 5th bowler in ODI's and you will find that JP goes for about 0.5 more per over than many of the specialist spinners in the WC.
I published all the spin bowlers stats on here who were involved in this WC, where JP's rpo and strike rate was much the same as the majority, including those used as specialist spinners.
It was while retrieving these stats that I realised how good Tahir is in ODI's, he is miles ahead of any other spinner in the WC in terms of strike rate etc.
The guy deserves more credit than he gets.....he is a strike bowler of note.
My main point re JP and some of the very average spinners we have picked as specialists, was that JP was just as good as them and therefore we should not be wasting our time with the likes of Peterson, Phasingo etc.
Hamer looks a better bet at test level and Tahir is our specialist in ODI's although sadly he is now 35.
Saff, once again we are actually in agreement. You are just too stubborn to admit it.
I agree with you that Duminy is a more than handy fifth bowler. I agree with you that he can bowl 10 overs per ODI on the odd occasion. As you have said, he is not a specialist bowler and there fore he would not be one of your prime bowlers. Robin Peterson was. Duminy is a batsman who is also a handy bowler. Peterson was a bowler who was also a handy batsman and that was the difference.
Peterson would have been expected to bowl 10 overs every game and contribute as well as possible with the bat, and he has in fact batted us out of the brown stuff on a number of occasions.
Duminy is expected to perform with the bat in every game and contribute as well as possible with the ball and he has in fact bowled us out of the brown stuff on a number of occasions.
Spot the subtle difference?
PS. If he can carry on with his bowling like this, he could well soon be a reckoned all-rounder but I doubt if he would ever be a "10 overs in every match" type of bowler. Even the great JHK hardly ever bowled 10 overs per match on a regular basis.